| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <53762581.30708@suse.de>
Date: Fri, 16 May 2014 16:49:37 +0200
From: Alexander Graf <agraf@...e.de>
To: Michael Mueller <mimu@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
CC: qemu-devel@...gnu.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Gleb Natapov <gleb@...nel.org>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
"Jason J. Herne" <jjherne@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@...ibm.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Andreas Faerber <afaerber@...e.de>,
Richard Henderson <rth@...ddle.net>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1 RFC 3/6] KVM: s390: use facilities and
cpu_id per KVM
On 16.05.14 16:46, Michael Mueller wrote:
> On Fri, 16 May 2014 13:55:41 +0200
> Alexander Graf <agraf@...e.de> wrote:
>
>> On 13.05.14 16:58, Michael Mueller wrote:
>>> The patch introduces facilities and cpu_ids per virtual machine.
>>> Different virtual machines may want to expose different facilities and
>>> cpu ids to the guest, so let's make them per-vm instead of global.
>>>
>>> In addition this patch renames all ocurrences of *facilities to *fac_list
>>> smilar to the already exiting symbol stfl_fac_list in lowcore.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Michael Mueller <mimu@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>> Acked-by: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@...ibm.com>
>>> Reviewed-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
>>> ---
>>> arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 7 +++
>>> arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c | 4 +-
>>> arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c | 107 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
>>> arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.h | 23 +++++++--
>>> arch/s390/kvm/priv.c | 13 +++--
>>> 5 files changed, 113 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h
>>> index 38d487a..b4751ba 100644
>>> --- a/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h
>>> +++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h
>>> @@ -414,6 +414,12 @@ struct kvm_s390_config {
>>> struct kvm_s390_attr_name name;
>>> };
>>>
>>> +struct kvm_s390_cpu_model {
>>> + unsigned long *sie_fac;
>>> + struct cpuid cpu_id;
>>> + unsigned long *fac_list;
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> struct kvm_arch{
>>> struct sca_block *sca;
>>> debug_info_t *dbf;
>>> @@ -427,6 +433,7 @@ struct kvm_arch{
>>> wait_queue_head_t ipte_wq;
>>> struct kvm_s390_config *cfg;
>>> spinlock_t start_stop_lock;
>>> + struct kvm_s390_cpu_model model;
>>> };
>>>
>>> #define KVM_HVA_ERR_BAD (-1UL)
>>> diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c b/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c
>>> index db608c3..4c7ca40 100644
>>> --- a/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c
>>> +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c
>>> @@ -358,8 +358,8 @@ static unsigned long guest_translate(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long
>>> gva, union asce asce;
>>>
>>> ctlreg0.val = vcpu->arch.sie_block->gcr[0];
>>> - edat1 = ctlreg0.edat && test_vfacility(8);
>>> - edat2 = edat1 && test_vfacility(78);
>>> + edat1 = ctlreg0.edat && test_kvm_facility(vcpu->kvm, 8);
>>> + edat2 = edat1 && test_kvm_facility(vcpu->kvm, 78);
>>> asce.val = get_vcpu_asce(vcpu);
>>> if (asce.r)
>>> goto real_address;
>>> diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
>>> index 01a5212..a53652f 100644
>>> --- a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
>>> +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
>>> @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
>>> /*
>>> - * hosting zSeries kernel virtual machines
>>> + * Hosting zSeries kernel virtual machines
>>> *
>>> * Copyright IBM Corp. 2008, 2009
>>> *
>>> @@ -30,7 +30,6 @@
>>> #include <asm/pgtable.h>
>>> #include <asm/nmi.h>
>>> #include <asm/switch_to.h>
>>> -#include <asm/facility.h>
>>> #include <asm/sclp.h>
>>> #include<asm/timex.h>
>>> #include "kvm-s390.h"
>>> @@ -92,15 +91,33 @@ struct kvm_stats_debugfs_item debugfs_entries[] = {
>>> { NULL }
>>> };
>>>
>>> -unsigned long *vfacilities;
>>> -static struct gmap_notifier gmap_notifier;
>>> +/* upper facilities limit for kvm */
>>> +unsigned long kvm_s390_fac_list_mask[] = {
>>> + 0xff82fff3f47c2000UL,
>>> + 0x005c000000000000UL,
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +unsigned long kvm_s390_fac_list_mask_size(void)
>>> +{
>>> + BUILD_BUG_ON(ARRAY_SIZE(kvm_s390_fac_list_mask) >
>>> + S390_ARCH_FAC_MASK_SIZE_U64);
>>> + return ARRAY_SIZE(kvm_s390_fac_list_mask);
>>> +}
>>>
>>> -/* test availability of vfacility */
>>> -int test_vfacility(unsigned long nr)
>>> +void kvm_s390_apply_fac_list_mask(unsigned long fac_list[])
>>> {
>>> - return __test_facility(nr, (void *) vfacilities);
>>> + unsigned int i;
>>> +
>>> + for (i = 0; i < S390_ARCH_FAC_LIST_SIZE_U64; i++) {
>>> + if (i < kvm_s390_fac_list_mask_size())
>>> + fac_list[i] &= kvm_s390_fac_list_mask[i];
>>> + else
>>> + fac_list[i] &= 0UL;
>>> + }
>>> }
>>>
>>> +static struct gmap_notifier gmap_notifier;
>>> +
>>> /* Section: not file related */
>>> int kvm_arch_hardware_enable(void *garbage)
>>> {
>>> @@ -485,6 +502,30 @@ long kvm_arch_vm_ioctl(struct file *filp,
>>> return r;
>>> }
>>>
>>> +/* make sure the memory used for fac_list is zeroed */
>>> +void kvm_s390_get_hard_fac_list(unsigned long *fac_list, int size)
>> Hard? Wouldn't "host" make more sense here?
> Renaming "*hard_fac_list" with "*host_fac_list" here and wherever it appears is ok with me.
>
>> I also think it makes sense to expose the native host facility list to
>> user space via an ioctl somehow.
>>
> In which situation do you need the full facility list. Do you have an example?
If you want to just implement -cpu host to get the exact feature set
that the host gives you, how do you know which set that is?
Alex
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists