linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] at91: cleanup for 3.16 #1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140516232635.GB6423@quad.lixom.net>
Date:	Fri, 16 May 2014 16:26:35 -0700
From:	Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
To:	Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>
Cc:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, arm@...nel.org,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@...osoft.com>,
	alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com,
	boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com, linus.walleij@...aro.org,
	Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] at91: cleanup for 3.16 #1

On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 07:39:35PM +0200, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
> On 07/05/2014 19:34, Nicolas Ferre :
> > Arnd, Olof, Kevin,
> > 
> > This is the first cleanup pull-request for 3.16. It is pretty big because it
> > integrates the work from Boris about CCF and Alexandre about IIO/ADC. I
> > integrated them in this cleanup topic because they both touch the core at91
> > code, the clk and IIO drivers as well as the DT. The concerned maintainers
> > added their tags.
> > 
> > The patch by Linus is a move of at91 specific GPIO definitions out of the
> > include/mach directory which is an step towards single zImage.
> > 
> > Thanks, best regards,
> > 
> > The following changes since commit 89ca3b881987f5a4be4c5dbaa7f0df12bbdde2fd:
> > 
> >   Linux 3.15-rc4 (2014-05-04 18:14:42 -0700)
> > 
> > are available in the git repository at:
> > 
> >   git://github.com/at91linux/linux-at91.git tags/at91-cleanup
> 
> There is a little conflict with at91-3.16-dt that you already pulled in
> arm-soc: here is the branch that resolves it:
> 
> https://github.com/at91linux/linux-at91/commits/at91-3.16-resolved

That resolution looks odd. Why is one clock under clocks { } and two of them
are at the top level? Shouldn't they all be under the clocks subnode?

I've merged in now with your resolution, but I think this needs revisiting.


-Olof
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/