[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140516233141.GC6423@quad.lixom.net>
Date: Fri, 16 May 2014 16:31:41 -0700
From: Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
To: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, arm@...nel.org,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@...osoft.com>,
alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com,
boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com, linus.walleij@...aro.org,
Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] at91: cleanup for 3.16 #1
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 04:26:35PM -0700, Olof Johansson wrote:
> On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 07:39:35PM +0200, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
> > On 07/05/2014 19:34, Nicolas Ferre :
> > > Arnd, Olof, Kevin,
> > >
> > > This is the first cleanup pull-request for 3.16. It is pretty big because it
> > > integrates the work from Boris about CCF and Alexandre about IIO/ADC. I
> > > integrated them in this cleanup topic because they both touch the core at91
> > > code, the clk and IIO drivers as well as the DT. The concerned maintainers
> > > added their tags.
> > >
> > > The patch by Linus is a move of at91 specific GPIO definitions out of the
> > > include/mach directory which is an step towards single zImage.
> > >
> > > Thanks, best regards,
> > >
> > > The following changes since commit 89ca3b881987f5a4be4c5dbaa7f0df12bbdde2fd:
> > >
> > > Linux 3.15-rc4 (2014-05-04 18:14:42 -0700)
> > >
> > > are available in the git repository at:
> > >
> > > git://github.com/at91linux/linux-at91.git tags/at91-cleanup
> >
> > There is a little conflict with at91-3.16-dt that you already pulled in
> > arm-soc: here is the branch that resolves it:
> >
> > https://github.com/at91linux/linux-at91/commits/at91-3.16-resolved
>
> That resolution looks odd. Why is one clock under clocks { } and two of them
> are at the top level? Shouldn't they all be under the clocks subnode?
>
> I've merged in now with your resolution, but I think this needs revisiting.
Oh, and also: The branch was named cleanup, but it really contains mostly new
driver and new contents, so I merged it under next/soc instead. In the future,
for releases when you have more contents, please split it up a bit more (dt
updates separately, driver updates separately) if it can be done without too
much hassle. For now it's not a huge deal to do it this way though.
-Olof
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists