[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140517185615.GB15585@mwanda>
Date: Sat, 17 May 2014 21:56:16 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To: Rickard Strandqvist <rickard_strandqvist@...ctrumdigital.se>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Masood Mehmood <ody.guru@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix for possible null pointer dereference in node.c
On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 03:21:56PM +0200, Rickard Strandqvist wrote:
> Okay, everyone agrees with Dan..?
>
You can audit it yourself, there are only 4 callers. The
node_allocate() is total garbage so the second delete_node() is a bit
complicated to read but it's not that hard.
> I have made a new patch, which does not check if hnode is NULL.
Send it inline so we can use our normal scripts.
regards,
dan carpenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists