[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140517191821.GD16662@pengutronix.de>
Date: Sat, 17 May 2014 21:18:21 +0200
From: Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
To: Emil Goode <emilgoode@...il.com>
Cc: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...escale.com>,
Sascha Hauer <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] ARM: imx: fix error handling in ipu device
registration
Hello Emil,
On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 08:40:33PM +0200, Emil Goode wrote:
> If we fail to allocate struct platform_device pdev we
> dereference it after the goto label err.
>
> I have rearranged the error handling a bit to fix the issue
> and also make it more clear.
>
> Signed-off-by: Emil Goode <emilgoode@...il.com>
> ---
> v3: Made subject line more specific.
> v2: Changed to return -ENOMEM instead of ret where possible and
> updated the subject line.
>
> arch/arm/mach-imx/devices/platform-ipu-core.c | 22 +++++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
Considering that you can fix the issue also by just doing:
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/devices/platform-ipu-core.c b/arch/arm/mach-imx/devices/platform-ipu-core.c
index fc4dd7cedc11..6bd7c3f37ac0 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/devices/platform-ipu-core.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/devices/platform-ipu-core.c
@@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ struct platform_device *__init imx_alloc_mx3_camera(
pdev = platform_device_alloc("mx3-camera", 0);
if (!pdev)
- goto err;
+ return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
pdev->dev.dma_mask = kmalloc(sizeof(*pdev->dev.dma_mask), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!pdev->dev.dma_mask)
or
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/devices/platform-ipu-core.c b/arch/arm/mach-imx/devices/platform-ipu-core.c
index fc4dd7cedc11..c609f3667200 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/devices/platform-ipu-core.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/devices/platform-ipu-core.c
@@ -96,7 +96,8 @@ struct platform_device *__init imx_alloc_mx3_camera(
ret = platform_device_add_data(pdev, pdata, sizeof(*pdata));
if (ret) {
err:
- kfree(pdev->dev.dma_mask);
+ if (pdev)
+ kfree(pdev->dev.dma_mask);
platform_device_put(pdev);
return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
}
I would prefer one of them as it is easier to justify and for the next
cycle convert the function to platform_device_register_full.
Also you should point out in the commit log that the issue was found by
coccinelle.
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists