linux-kernel - [PATCH 2/2] staging: rtl8821ae: fix not declared symbols should be static in sw.c

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 17 May 2014 21:23:38 +0200
From:	Konrad Zapalowicz <bergo.torino@...il.com>
To:	gregkh@...uxfoundation.org
Cc:	standby24x7@...il.com, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Konrad Zapalowicz <bergo.torino@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] staging: rtl8821ae: fix not declared symbols should be static in sw.c

This commit fixes the following sparse warnings:

drivers/staging/rtl8821ae/rtl8821ae/sw.c:
    - 48:6: warning: symbol 'rtl8821ae_init_aspm_vars' was not declared.
      Should it be static?
    - 228:5: warning: symbol 'rtl8812ae_rx_command_packet_handler' was
      not declared. Should it be static?
    - 263:20: warning: symbol 'rtl8821ae_hal_ops' was not declared.
      Should it be static?
    - 314:23: warning: symbol 'rtl8821ae_mod_params' was not declared.
      Should it be static?
    - 321:20: warning: symbol 'rtl8821ae_hal_cfg' was not declared.
      Should it be static?

All of this symbols are local, that is there are no references to them
in the other files from this driver.

Signed-off-by: Konrad Zapalowicz <bergo.torino@...il.com>
---
 drivers/staging/rtl8821ae/rtl8821ae/sw.c | 10 +++++-----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8821ae/rtl8821ae/sw.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8821ae/rtl8821ae/sw.c
index c24d426..e90806e 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/rtl8821ae/rtl8821ae/sw.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8821ae/rtl8821ae/sw.c
@@ -45,7 +45,7 @@
 #include "hal_btc.h"
 #include "../btcoexist/rtl_btc.h"
 
-void rtl8821ae_init_aspm_vars(struct ieee80211_hw *hw)
+static void rtl8821ae_init_aspm_vars(struct ieee80211_hw *hw)
 {
 	struct rtl_pci *rtlpci = rtl_pcidev(rtl_pcipriv(hw));
 
@@ -225,7 +225,7 @@ void rtl8821ae_deinit_sw_vars(struct ieee80211_hw *hw)
 	//printk("<=========rtl8821ae_deinit_sw_vars().\n");
 }
 
-u32 rtl8812ae_rx_command_packet_handler(
+static u32 rtl8812ae_rx_command_packet_handler(
 	struct ieee80211_hw *hw,
 	struct rtl_stats status,
 	struct sk_buff *skb
@@ -260,7 +260,7 @@ bool rtl8821ae_get_btc_status(void)
 	return true;
 }
 
-struct rtl_hal_ops rtl8821ae_hal_ops = {
+static struct rtl_hal_ops rtl8821ae_hal_ops = {
 	.init_sw_vars = rtl8821ae_init_sw_vars,
 	.deinit_sw_vars = rtl8821ae_deinit_sw_vars,
 	.read_eeprom_info = rtl8821ae_read_eeprom_info,
@@ -311,14 +311,14 @@ struct rtl_hal_ops rtl8821ae_hal_ops = {
 	.rx_command_packet_handler = rtl8812ae_rx_command_packet_handler,
 };
 
-struct rtl_mod_params rtl8821ae_mod_params = {
+static struct rtl_mod_params rtl8821ae_mod_params = {
 	.sw_crypto = false,
 	.b_inactiveps = false,//true,
 	.b_swctrl_lps = false,
 	.b_fwctrl_lps = false, //true,
 };
 
-struct rtl_hal_cfg rtl8821ae_hal_cfg = {
+static struct rtl_hal_cfg rtl8821ae_hal_cfg = {
 	.bar_id = 2,
 	.write_readback = true,
 	.name = "rtl8821ae_pci",
-- 
1.8.1.2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/