[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1400407278.4698.5.camel@schoellingm.dzne.de>
Date: Sun, 18 May 2014 12:01:18 +0200
From: Manuel Schoelling <manuel.schoelling@....de>
To: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Anton Altaparmakov <anton@...era.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs: Cleanup string initializations (char[] instead of
char *)
Thanks for the detailed review of my patches, guys!
I had a look at the assembler code now, too and you are right about
this.
I was misguided by the KernelJanitor's TODO list [1]. If there is
consensus the corresponding paragraph from that list should be removed.
[1] http://kernelnewbies.org/KernelJanitors/Todo
On Sa, 2014-05-17 at 17:53 +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 05:00:18PM +0200, Manuel Schölling wrote:
> > Initializations like 'char *foo = "bar"' will create two variables: a static
> > string and a pointer (foo) to that static string. Instead 'char foo[] = "bar"'
> > will declare a single variable and will end up in shorter
> > assembly (according to Jeff Garzik on the KernelJanitor's TODO list).
>
> The hell it will. Compare assembler generated e.g. for 32bit x86 before
> and after.
>
> > {
> > char *dp;
> > char *status = "disabled";
> > - const char * flags = "flags: ";
> > + const char flags[] = "flags: ";
>
> The first variant puts address of constant array into local variable
> (on stack or in a register). The second one fills local _array_ - the
> string itself goes on stack.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists