linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/4] spi: qup: Correct selection of FIFO/Block mode

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 19 May 2014 10:31:44 +0300
From:	"Ivan T. Ivanov" <iivanov@...sol.com>
To:	Andy Gross <agross@...eaurora.org>
Cc:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...ymobile.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] spi: qup: Correct selection of FIFO/Block mode

On Tue, 2014-05-13 at 16:34 -0500, Andy Gross wrote:
> This patch fixes the calculation for determining whether to use FIFO or BLOCK
> mode.

<snip>

> @@ -368,7 +368,7 @@ static int spi_qup_io_config(struct spi_device *spi, struct spi_transfer *xfer)
>  	n_words = xfer->len / w_size;
>  	controller->w_size = w_size;
>  
> -	if (n_words <= controller->in_fifo_sz) {
> +	if (n_words <= (controller->in_fifo_sz / sizeof(u32))) {

Wouldn't be better to divide by w_size? Probably will not make
too much difference, but..

>  		mode = QUP_IO_M_MODE_FIFO;

Regards,
Ivan

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/