[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140519074155.GO15585@mwanda>
Date: Mon, 19 May 2014 10:41:55 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@...6.fr>
Cc: Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
J Keerthy <j-keerthy@...com>, Tero Kristo <t-kristo@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/13] CLK: TI: DRA7: make return of 0 explicit
This one does feel like a bug in the original code as you mention. I
have added the TI devs to the CC list so they can help us.
regards,
dan carpenter
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 06:31:05AM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> From: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@...6.fr>
>
> Delete unnecessary local variable whose value is always 0 and that hides
> the fact that the result is always 0.
>
> Additionally dropped some unneeded braces in an affected if.
>
> A simplified version of the semantic patch that fixes this problem is as
> follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
>
> // <smpl>
> @r exists@
> local idexpression ret;
> expression e;
> position p;
> @@
>
> -ret = 0;
> ... when != ret = e
> return
> - ret
> + 0
> ;
> // </smpl>
>
> Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@...6.fr>
>
> ---
> Alternatively, is an error code wanted in either of the MAX_APLL_WAIT_TRIES
> cases?
>
> drivers/clk/ti/apll.c | 13 +++++--------
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/ti/apll.c b/drivers/clk/ti/apll.c
> index b986f61..659032a 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/ti/apll.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/ti/apll.c
> @@ -37,7 +37,7 @@
> static int dra7_apll_enable(struct clk_hw *hw)
> {
> struct clk_hw_omap *clk = to_clk_hw_omap(hw);
> - int r = 0, i = 0;
> + int i = 0;
> struct dpll_data *ad;
> const char *clk_name;
> u8 state = 1;
> @@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ static int dra7_apll_enable(struct clk_hw *hw)
> v = ti_clk_ll_ops->clk_readl(ad->idlest_reg);
>
> if ((v & ad->idlest_mask) == state)
> - return r;
> + return 0;
>
> v = ti_clk_ll_ops->clk_readl(ad->control_reg);
> v &= ~ad->enable_mask;
> @@ -74,17 +74,14 @@ static int dra7_apll_enable(struct clk_hw *hw)
> udelay(1);
> }
>
> - if (i == MAX_APLL_WAIT_TRIES) {
> + if (i == MAX_APLL_WAIT_TRIES)
> pr_warn("clock: %s failed transition to '%s'\n",
> clk_name, (state) ? "locked" : "bypassed");
> - } else {
> + else
> pr_debug("clock: %s transition to '%s' in %d loops\n",
> clk_name, (state) ? "locked" : "bypassed", i);
>
> - r = 0;
> - }
> -
> - return r;
> + return 0;
> }
>
> static void dra7_apll_disable(struct clk_hw *hw)
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists