[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87oaythsvk.fsf@rustcorp.com.au>
Date: Tue, 20 May 2014 15:52:07 +0930
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
To: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
benh@...nel.crashing.org, paulus@...ba.org, riel@...hat.com,
mgorman@...e.de, ak@...ux.intel.com, peterz@...radead.org,
mingo@...nel.org, dave.hansen@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 0/2] mm: FAULT_AROUND_ORDER patchset performance data for powerpc
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com> writes:
> Andrew Morton wrote:
>> On Mon, 19 May 2014 16:23:07 -0700 (PDT) Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Shouldn't FAULT_AROUND_ORDER and fault_around_order be changed to be
>> > the order of the fault-around size in bytes, and fault_around_pages()
>> > use 1UL << (fault_around_order - PAGE_SHIFT)
>>
>> Yes. And shame on me for missing it (this time!) at review.
>>
>> There's still time to fix this. Patches, please.
>
> Here it is. Made at 3.30 AM, build tested only.
Prefer on top of Maddy's patch which makes it always a variable, rather
than CONFIG_DEBUG_FS. It's got enough hair as it is.
Cheers,
Rusty.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists