[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LSU.2.11.1405191930130.3574@eggly.anvils>
Date: Mon, 19 May 2014 19:34:27 -0700 (PDT)
From: Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
benh@...nel.crashing.org, paulus@...ba.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, riel@...hat.com, mgorman@...e.de,
ak@...ux.intel.com, peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...nel.org,
dave.hansen@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 0/2] mm: FAULT_AROUND_ORDER patchset performance data
for powerpc
On Tue, 20 May 2014, Rusty Russell wrote:
> Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com> writes:
> >> On Monday 19 May 2014 05:42 AM, Rusty Russell wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Perhaps we try to generalize from two data points (a slight improvement
> >> > over doing it from 1!), eg:
> >> >
> >> > /* 4 seems good for 4k-page x86, 0 seems good for 64k page ppc64, so: */
> >> > unsigned int fault_around_order __read_mostly =
> >> > (16 - PAGE_SHIFT < 0 ? 0 : 16 - PAGE_SHIFT);
> >
> > Rusty's bimodal answer doesn't seem the right starting point to me.
>
> ? It's not bimodal, it's graded. I think you misread?
Yikes, worse than misread, more like I was too rude even to read: sorry!
Hugh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists