[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPybu_1FnfFKT-X-VNP+HgAKjitJSVy0O2GY5uY+icS8RwfrcA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 20 May 2014 10:55:43 +0200
From: Ricardo Ribalda Delgado <ricardo.ribalda@...il.com>
To: David Laight <David.Laight@...lab.com>
Cc: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>,
"gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Kernel development list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
USB list <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
"joe@...ches.com" <joe@...ches.com>,
"auttamchandani@...icube.com" <auttamchandani@...icube.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] usb: gadget: net2280: Pass checkpacth.pl test
Not for grep...
But if this is an issue I have no problem going back to the original.
We can spend a whole year just talking about codestyle.
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 10:52 AM, David Laight <David.Laight@...lab.com> wrote:
> From: Alan Stern
> ...
>> > -static struct usb_request *
>> > -net2280_alloc_request (struct usb_ep *_ep, gfp_t gfp_flags)
>> > +static struct usb_request *net2280_alloc_request(struct usb_ep *_ep,
>> > + gfp_t gfp_flags)
>>
>> What's with the extreme indentation on the continuation line? The
>> style used here is for continuation lines to be indented by two stops
>> relative to the first line.
>
> Also why move the line break?
> The Linux kernel has both styles, and the original one (with the
> function name starting in column 1) makes it much easier to search
> to the definition.
>
> David
>
>
>
--
Ricardo Ribalda
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists