[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140520161632.GA13942@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 20 May 2014 19:16:32 +0300
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: Igor Royzis <igorr@...rtex.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Tom Herbert <therbert@...gle.com>,
Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>,
Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>,
Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>,
Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>,
Paul Durrant <Paul.Durrant@...rix.com>,
Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...e.com>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...e.cz>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Anton Nayshtut <anton@...rtex.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fixed zero copy GSO without orphaning the fragments
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 09:05:38AM -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-05-20 at 07:28 -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > On Tue, 2014-05-20 at 14:24 +0300, Igor Royzis wrote:
> > > Fix accessing GSO fragments memory (and a possible corruption therefore) after
> > > reporting completion in a zero copy callback. The previous fix in the commit 1fd819ec
> > > orphaned frags which eliminates zero copy advantages. The fix makes the completion
> > > called after all the fragments were processed avoiding unnecessary orphaning/copying
> > > from userspace.
> > >
> > > The GSO fragments corruption issue was observed in a typical QEMU/KVM VM setup that
> > > hosts a Windows guest (since QEMU virtio-net Windows driver doesn't support GRO).
> > > The fix has been verified by running the HCK OffloadLSO test.
> > >
>
> It looks like all segments (generated by GSO segmentation) should share
> original ubuf_info, and that it should be refcounted.
>
> A nightmare I suppose...
That's what skb_frag_ref tried to do only for fragments, I guess.
> (transferring the ubuf_info from original skb to last segment would be
> racy, as the last segment could be freed _before_ previous ones, in case
> a drop happens in qdisc layer, or packets are reordered by netem)
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists