lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 20 May 2014 11:20:25 +0800
From:	Ming Lei <tom.leiming@...il.com>
To:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc:	Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: mq flush: fix race between IPI handler and mq
 flush worker

On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 11:18 PM, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de> wrote:
> On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 11:05:50PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
>> Another simple fix is to disable ipi for flush request, but looks
>> this one should be better.
>
> I think the first thing is to bite the bullet and sort out and document
> the various unions in struct request for real.

Considered the problem can be reproduced easily and cause
data loss on kvm-guest, I hope fix can be seen in 3.15. Also
it should be backported to 3.14 because someone may
enable ctx->ipi_redirect.

Thinking it further, looks the patch is fine:

- sizeof(call_single_data) and sizeof(work_struct) is very close
and both are not small, so it is reasonable to put the two in
one union for saving request space

- the conflict on the two structures just happens with flush
requests because rq->requeue_work is only used to queue
flush requests

- in the flush sequence, the conflict won't happen on request
with data, so it only happens with completing and queueing
PREFLUSH/POSTFLUSH request.

Any comments and suggestions?


Thanks,
-- 
Ming Lei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists