lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 21 May 2014 14:01:46 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <>
To:	Anshuman Khandual <>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <>,
	Michael Ellerman <>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <>
Subject: Re: Fwd: [V6 00/11] perf: New conditional branch filter

On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 04:09:55PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> On 05/21/2014 02:53 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 02:41:58PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> >> Hello Peter/Ingo,
> >>
> >> Would you please consider reviewing the first four patches in this patch series
> >> which changes the generic perf kernel and perf tools code. Andi Kleen and Stephane
> >> Eranian have already reviewed these changes. The rest of the patch series is related
> >> to powerpc and being reviewed by Michael Ellerman/Ben.
> >>
> > 
> > If they land in my inbox I might have a look.
> > 
> Sent.

Thanks, they look fine to me, although 1/x can use a lightly longer
changelog, making it explicit its a filter for conditional branches.

How do people want this routed? Should I take all patches through tip,
or do I ask Ingo to create a special perf/cond branch which includes the
first 4 patches which can be merged into whatever ppc branch and the
rest then go on top in the ppc tree?
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists