[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <537D762F.1080100@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 22 May 2014 09:29:43 +0530
From: Anshuman Khandual <khandual@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
Subject: Re: Fwd: [V6 00/11] perf: New conditional branch filter
On 05/21/2014 05:31 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 04:09:55PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>> On 05/21/2014 02:53 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>>> On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 02:41:58PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>>>> Hello Peter/Ingo,
>>>>
>>>> Would you please consider reviewing the first four patches in this patch series
>>>> which changes the generic perf kernel and perf tools code. Andi Kleen and Stephane
>>>> Eranian have already reviewed these changes. The rest of the patch series is related
>>>> to powerpc and being reviewed by Michael Ellerman/Ben.
>>>>
>>>
>>> If they land in my inbox I might have a look.
>>>
>>
>> Sent.
>
> Thanks, they look fine to me, although 1/x can use a lightly longer
> changelog, making it explicit its a filter for conditional branches.
>
> How do people want this routed? Should I take all patches through tip,
> or do I ask Ingo to create a special perf/cond branch which includes the
> first 4 patches which can be merged into whatever ppc branch and the
> rest then go on top in the ppc tree?
>
Peter,
Thanks for considering the patchset.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists