[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.10.1405210937440.8038@gentwo.org>
Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 09:41:03 -0500 (CDT)
From: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
To: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@...allels.com>
cc: hannes@...xchg.org, mhocko@...e.cz, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 3/3] slub: reparent memcg caches' slabs on memcg
offline
On Mon, 19 May 2014, Vladimir Davydov wrote:
> 3) Per cpu partial slabs. We can disable this feature for dead caches by
> adding appropriate check to kmem_cache_has_cpu_partial.
There is already a s->cpu_partial number in kmem_cache. If that is zero
then no partial cpu slabs should be kept.
> So far, everything looks very simple - it seems we don't have to modify
> __slab_free at all if we follow the instruction above.
>
> However, there is one thing regarding preemptable kernels. The problem
> is after forbidding the cache store free slabs in per-cpu/node partial
> lists by setting min_partial=0 and kmem_cache_has_cpu_partial=false
> (i.e. marking the cache as dead), we have to make sure that all frees
> that saw the cache as alive are over, otherwise they can occasionally
> add a free slab to a per-cpu/node partial list *after* the cache was
> marked dead. For instance,
Ok then lets switch off preeempt there? Preemption is not supported by
most distribution and so will have the least impact.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists