[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2173444.bOnmhZJafF@vostro.rjw.lan>
Date: Thu, 22 May 2014 01:57:29 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc: Lists linaro-kernel <linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org>,
"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Arvind Chauhan <arvind.chauhan@....com>,
Ips Gandhi <inderpal.s@...sung.com>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>,
Chander Kashyap <chander.kashyap@...aro.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.daniel@...sung.com>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>,
Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...aro.org>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH Resend] driver/core: cpu: initialize opp table
On Tuesday, May 20, 2014 08:08:11 AM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 20 May 2014 02:43, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net> wrote:
> > What about
> >
> > if (error)
> > return error;
> >
> > and then you'd save an indentation level?
>
> Yes.
>
> > Anyway, I find adding of_node* stuff directly to the driver core this way
> > kind of disgusting as there still are platforms that don't use it.
> >
> > Can we have a call to a function that will change into an empty stub on such
> > platforms here, please?
>
> Okay. But can you explain a bit more about how and where those stubs
> would be implemented?
In a header file included by cpu.c. Something like
#if defined(CONFIG_OF) && defined(CONFIG_PM_OPP)
<function header>
#else
static inline <stub>
#endif
--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists