linux-kernel - [PATCH] mfd: db8500-prcmu: remove check for CONFIG_DBX500_PRCMU

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 22 May 2014 22:55:31 +0200
From:	Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>
To:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc:	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] mfd: db8500-prcmu: remove check for
 CONFIG_DBX500_PRCMU_DEBUG

A check for CONFIG_DBX500_PRCMU_DEBUG was added in v3.6. But there's no
Kconfig symbol DBX500_PRCMU_DEBUG. So remove this check.

Signed-off-by: Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>
---
Untested. Note that db8500_prcmu_debug_dump() is nowhere to be found in
the tree.

This check has been in the tree for less than two years. Am I being
impatient here?

 drivers/mfd/db8500-prcmu.c | 3 ---
 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mfd/db8500-prcmu.c b/drivers/mfd/db8500-prcmu.c
index 7694e0700d34..c248bde367ab 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/db8500-prcmu.c
+++ b/drivers/mfd/db8500-prcmu.c
@@ -2303,9 +2303,6 @@ int prcmu_ac_wake_req(void)
 
 	if (!wait_for_completion_timeout(&mb0_transfer.ac_wake_work,
 			msecs_to_jiffies(5000))) {
-#if defined(CONFIG_DBX500_PRCMU_DEBUG)
-		db8500_prcmu_debug_dump(__func__, true, true);
-#endif
 		pr_crit("prcmu: %s timed out (5 s) waiting for a reply.\n",
 			__func__);
 		ret = -EFAULT;
-- 
1.9.0

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/