[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHbNUh152xgyVxcCHiv0M6PLw8DE7KZ990WG7uRWWFBc8sPWRQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 23 May 2014 17:06:27 +0530
From: Tushar Behera <tushar.behera@...aro.org>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: Linux-ALSA <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>, Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
"jerry.wong" <jerry.wong@...imintegrated.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ASoC: max98090: Add master clock handling
On 23 May 2014 16:44, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 11:05:17AM +0530, Tushar Behera wrote:
>
>> I tested with moving clk_enable/clk_disable calls to set_bias_level():
>> SND_SOC_BIAS_PREPARE. That works well for me. Does it look okay?
>
>> + if (!IS_ERR(max98090->mclk)) {
>> + if (codec->dapm.bias_level == SND_SOC_BIAS_ON)
>> + clk_disable(max98090->mclk);
>> + else
>> + clk_enable(max98090->mclk);
>> + }
>> break;
>
> Should be clk_prepare_enable() and similarly for the disable and you
> should check the error codes but yes, that looks good.
I was planning to keep clk_prepare/clk_unprepare in probe/remove.
We are not doing anything specific with the return codes here, so
might be I will add only a error message in case enable/disable fails.
--
Tushar Behera
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists