[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140525185624.GR10768@lukather>
Date: Sun, 25 May 2014 20:56:24 +0200
From: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
To: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>,
Emilio Lopez <emilio@...pez.com.ar>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
Boris BREZILLON <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>,
Luc Verhaegen <libv@...net.be>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/22] clk: sunxi: Implement A31 PLL6 as a divs clock for
2x output
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 03:51:12PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> Some clock modules on the A31 use PLL6x2 as one of their inputs.
> This patch changes the PLL6 implementation for A31 to a divs clock,
> i.e. clock with multiple outputs that have different dividers.
>
> This behavior is consistent with previous SoC's by Allwinner.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>
> ---
> drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c | 11 ++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c b/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c
> index 6857c6e..339cabc 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c
> @@ -496,6 +496,7 @@ static const struct factors_data sun6i_a31_pll6_data __initconst = {
> .enable = 31,
> .table = &sun6i_a31_pll6_config,
> .getter = sun6i_a31_get_pll6_factors,
> + .name = "pll6",
> };
>
> static const struct factors_data sun4i_apb1_data __initconst = {
> @@ -969,6 +970,14 @@ static const struct divs_data pll6_divs_data __initconst = {
> }
> };
>
> +static const struct divs_data sun6i_a31_pll6_divs_data __initconst = {
> + .factors = &sun6i_a31_pll6_data,
> + .ndivs = 1,
> + .div = {
> + { .fixed = 2 }, /* P, other */
> + }
> +};
> +
> /**
> * sunxi_divs_clk_setup() - Setup function for leaf divisors on clocks
> *
> @@ -1108,7 +1117,6 @@ static const struct of_device_id clk_factors_match[] __initconst = {
> {.compatible = "allwinner,sun4i-a10-pll1-clk", .data = &sun4i_pll1_data,},
> {.compatible = "allwinner,sun6i-a31-pll1-clk", .data = &sun6i_a31_pll1_data,},
> {.compatible = "allwinner,sun7i-a20-pll4-clk", .data = &sun7i_a20_pll4_data,},
> - {.compatible = "allwinner,sun6i-a31-pll6-clk", .data = &sun6i_a31_pll6_data,},
> {.compatible = "allwinner,sun4i-a10-apb1-clk", .data = &sun4i_apb1_data,},
> {.compatible = "allwinner,sun4i-a10-mod0-clk", .data = &sun4i_mod0_data,},
> {.compatible = "allwinner,sun7i-a20-out-clk", .data = &sun7i_a20_out_data,},
> @@ -1128,6 +1136,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id clk_div_match[] __initconst = {
> static const struct of_device_id clk_divs_match[] __initconst = {
> {.compatible = "allwinner,sun4i-a10-pll5-clk", .data = &pll5_divs_data,},
> {.compatible = "allwinner,sun4i-a10-pll6-clk", .data = &pll6_divs_data,},
> + {.compatible = "allwinner,sun6i-a31-pll6-clk", .data = &sun6i_a31_pll6_divs_data,},
Can't the PLL6x2 clock just be a fixed-factor-clock? It would make the
change trivial, and better fit what it actually is.
Maxime
--
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists