[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKohpomam0qKdkMMMRDOfWN9QnZ3DzCviV=RuZ5f_7JbmYNDNw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 26 May 2014 16:37:13 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Cc: Sören Brinkmann <soren.brinkmann@...inx.com>,
Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>,
Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>,
"cpufreq@...r.kernel.org" <cpufreq@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/5] clk: Introduce 'clk_round_rate_nearest()'
On 26 May 2014 16:52, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net> wrote:
> I agree as far as the 64-bit thing goes, but is switching to Hz really
> necessary?
Don't really know that.. It seems that there will always be problems with
close enough frequencies whenever rounding is done.
More can be elaborated by Soren.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists