[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <BA47464B-B724-4D41-8D82-1A8880E310E9@konsulko.com>
Date: Mon, 26 May 2014 14:08:32 +0300
From: Pantelis Antoniou <pantelis.antoniou@...sulko.com>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
Matt Porter <matt.porter@...aro.org>,
Koen Kooi <koen@...inion.thruhere.net>,
Alison Chaiken <Alison_Chaiken@...tor.com>,
Dinh Nguyen <dinh.linux@...il.com>,
Jan Lubbe <jluebbe@...net.de>,
Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@....com>,
Michael Stickel <ms@...able.de>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Dirk Behme <dirk.behme@...il.com>,
Alan Tull <delicious.quinoa@...il.com>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Michael Bohan <mbohan@...eaurora.org>,
Ionut Nicu <ioan.nicu.ext@....com>,
Michal Simek <monstr@...str.eu>,
Matt Ranostay <mranostay@...il.com>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Pete Popov <pete.popov@...sulko.com>,
Dan Malek <dan.malek@...sulko.com>,
Georgi Vlaev <georgi.vlaev@...sulko.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/8] OF: Introduce DT overlay support.
Hi Geert,
On May 26, 2014, at 1:57 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Grant,
>
> On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 12:48 PM, Grant Likely
> <grant.likely@...retlab.ca> wrote:
>> On Tue, 20 May 2014 09:38:49 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org> wrote:
>>> On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 7:50 AM, Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca> wrote:
>>>>> Why has the overlay system been designed for plugging and unpluging whole
>>>>> overlays?
>>>>> That means the kernel has to remember the full stack, causing issues with
>>>>> e.g. kexec.
>>>>
>>>> Mostly so that drivers don't see any difference in the livetree data
>>>> structure. It also means that userspace sees a single representation of
>>>> the hardware at any given time.
>>>
>>> Sorry, I don't follow the argument about the "single representation of the
>>> hardware".
>>
>> Er, s/of the hardware/of the tree/. Right now the overlay design
>> modifies the live tree which at the same time modifies the tree
>> representation in /sys/firmware/devicetree. If the design was changed to
>> keep the overlay logically separate, then I would think we want to
>> expose that information to usespace also. In fact, I think we would need
>> to for usecases like kexec.
>
> OK, so it does modify the real tree, and doesn't keep the actual overlays.
>
It modifies the actual tree, and it keeps a log of each modification made to the
tree so that it will be able to revert the changes made.
> I was under the impression the overlay stack was also kept in memory, to allow
> reversal, so there was a misunderstanding.
>
Yep.
> Hence for kexec, the tree in /sys/firmware/devicetree can just be passed
> to the new kernel, as that's the current representation of the hardware?
>
Exactly.
> Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
>
> Geert
>
Regards
-- Pantelis
> --
> Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org
>
> In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
> when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
> -- Linus Torvalds
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists