[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140526165039.GE2066@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Mon, 26 May 2014 18:50:41 +0200
From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...aro.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] irq_work: Implement remote queueing
On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 06:02:24PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 04:29:49PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > +bool irq_work_queue_on(struct irq_work *work, int cpu)
> > +{
> > + /* Only queue if not already pending */
> > + if (!irq_work_claim(work))
> > + return false;
> > +
> > + /* All work should have been flushed before going offline */
> > + WARN_ON_ONCE(cpu_is_offline(cpu));
> WARN_ON_ONCE(in_nmi());
But it's actually NMI safe, isn't it?
>
>
> Also, I would do both these checks before the claim thing.
Right, I'll move the check.
>
> > +
> > + if (llist_add(&work->llnode, &per_cpu(raised_list, cpu)))
> > + native_send_call_func_single_ipi(cpu);
> > +
> > + return true;
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(irq_work_queue_on);
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists