[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140526165105.GD3693@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 26 May 2014 17:51:05 +0100
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To: Emil Goode <emilgoode@...il.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
Yann Droneaud <ydroneaud@...eya.com>,
Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...escale.com>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
Sascha Hauer <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] driver core/platform: don't leak memory allocated
for dma_mask
On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 06:41:21PM +0200, Emil Goode wrote:
> @@ -211,6 +215,7 @@ struct platform_device *platform_device_alloc(const char *name, int id)
> strcpy(pa->name, name);
> pa->pdev.name = pa->name;
> pa->pdev.id = id;
> + pa->pdev.dev.dma_mask = &pa->dma_mask;
There is code in the kernel which, rightly or wrongly, checks whether
dev->dma_mask is NULL to determine whether the device can do any kind
of DMA. The above results in devices allocated via this interface
always having this member set, which is a change of core kernel behaviour.
How sure are you that this will not break anything?
--
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: now at 9.7Mbps down 460kbps up... slowly
improving, and getting towards what was expected from it.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists