[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALCETrVqVX_P75vLLR6A1iBbjzMG-hHmTEUC+_hSpa9rHWcRaw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 26 May 2014 10:59:33 -0700
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86, MCE: Flesh out when to panic comment
On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 10:51 AM, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de> wrote:
> On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 09:47:38AM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>> It may be worth at least pointing out that mce_severity looks at
>> whether we faulted from kernel context. I missed that the first time
>> around because mce_severity doesn't take a pt_regs pointer.
>
> Right, but next time we talk about a different aspect which isn't
> commented on in the handler, we'd have to add to it again, until we've
> rewritten the whole function in pseudo code.
>
> I think simply pointing to the function which decides the fate of the
> machine based on the MCE severity is enough - people can then go and
> stare at it, albeit with some struggle.
Fair enough.
>
> --
> Regards/Gruss,
> Boris.
>
> Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
> --
--
Andy Lutomirski
AMA Capital Management, LLC
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists