[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140526175138.GB26531@pd.tnic>
Date: Mon, 26 May 2014 19:51:38 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86, MCE: Flesh out when to panic comment
On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 09:47:38AM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> It may be worth at least pointing out that mce_severity looks at
> whether we faulted from kernel context. I missed that the first time
> around because mce_severity doesn't take a pt_regs pointer.
Right, but next time we talk about a different aspect which isn't
commented on in the handler, we'd have to add to it again, until we've
rewritten the whole function in pseudo code.
I think simply pointing to the function which decides the fate of the
machine based on the MCE severity is enough - people can then go and
stare at it, albeit with some struggle.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists