linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] driver core/platform: don't leak memory allocated for dma

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140526183155.GA1312@lianli>
Date:	Mon, 26 May 2014 20:31:55 +0200
From:	Emil Goode <emilgoode@...il.com>
To:	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Uwe Kleine-König 
	<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
	Yann Droneaud <ydroneaud@...eya.com>,
	Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...escale.com>,
	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
	Sascha Hauer <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
	Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] driver core/platform: don't leak memory allocated
 for dma_mask

Hello Russell,

On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 05:51:05PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 06:41:21PM +0200, Emil Goode wrote:
> > @@ -211,6 +215,7 @@ struct platform_device *platform_device_alloc(const char *name, int id)
> >  		strcpy(pa->name, name);
> >  		pa->pdev.name = pa->name;
> >  		pa->pdev.id = id;
> > +		pa->pdev.dev.dma_mask = &pa->dma_mask;
> 
> There is code in the kernel which, rightly or wrongly, checks whether
> dev->dma_mask is NULL to determine whether the device can do any kind
> of DMA.  The above results in devices allocated via this interface
> always having this member set, which is a change of core kernel behaviour.
> 
> How sure are you that this will not break anything?

Thank you for pointing this out, considering the number of calls made to
platform_device_alloc it would be easy to miss an occurrance of this problem.
I would say that the risk heavily outweighs the gain and it's better to 
not apply this series.

Best regards,

Emil Goode
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/