[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5384700E.1030501@citrix.com>
Date: Tue, 27 May 2014 11:59:26 +0100
From: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>
To: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@...rix.com>,
Mukesh Rathor <mukesh.rathor@...cle.com>,
<boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>
CC: <xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [V1 PATCH] dom0 pvh: map foreign pfns in our p2m
for toolstack
On 27/05/14 11:43, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On 24/05/14 03:33, Mukesh Rathor wrote:
>> When running as dom0 in pvh mode, foreign pfns that are accessed must be
>> added to our p2m which is managed by xen. This is done via
>> XENMEM_add_to_physmap_range hypercall. This is needed for toolstack
>> building guests and mapping guest memory, xentrace mapping xen pages,
>> etc..
Thanks.
Applied to devel/for-linus-3.16, but see comments below.
>> +static int xlate_add_to_p2m(unsigned long lpfn, unsigned long fgmfn,
>> + unsigned int domid)
The preferred abbreviation is GFN not GMFN. I fixed this up.
>> +{
>> + int rc, err = 0;
>> + xen_pfn_t gpfn = lpfn;
>> + xen_ulong_t idx = fgmfn;
>> +
>> + struct xen_add_to_physmap_range xatp = {
>> + .domid = DOMID_SELF,
>> + .foreign_domid = domid,
>> + .size = 1,
>> + .space = XENMAPSPACE_gmfn_foreign,
>> + };
>> + set_xen_guest_handle(xatp.idxs, &idx);
>> + set_xen_guest_handle(xatp.gpfns, &gpfn);
>> + set_xen_guest_handle(xatp.errs, &err);
>> +
>> + rc = HYPERVISOR_memory_op(XENMEM_add_to_physmap_range, &xatp);
>> + return rc;
>
> Thanks for the patches, I see two problems with this approach, the first
> one is that you are completely ignoring the error in the variable "err",
> which means that you can end up with a pfn that Linux thinks it's valid,
> but it's not mapped to any mfn, so when you try to access it you will
> trigger the vioapic crash.
I spotted this and fixed this up by adding:
+ if (rc < 0)
+ return rc;
+ return err;
> The second one is that this seems extremely inefficient, you are issuing
> one hypercall for each memory page, when you could instead batch all the
> pages into a single hypercall and map them in one shot.
I agree, but the 3.16 merge window is nearly here so I've applied it
as-is. Note that the privcmd driver calls this function once per page,
so the lack of batching doesn't really hurt here.
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists