[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140527114616.1dd86141@mantra.us.oracle.com>
Date: Tue, 27 May 2014 11:46:16 -0700
From: Mukesh Rathor <mukesh.rathor@...cle.com>
To: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>
Cc: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@...rix.com>,
<boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>, <xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [V1 PATCH] dom0 pvh: map foreign pfns in our p2m
for toolstack
On Tue, 27 May 2014 11:59:26 +0100
David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com> wrote:
> On 27/05/14 11:43, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> > On 24/05/14 03:33, Mukesh Rathor wrote:
> >> When running as dom0 in pvh mode, foreign pfns that are accessed
> >> must be added to our p2m which is managed by xen. This is done via
> >> XENMEM_add_to_physmap_range hypercall. This is needed for toolstack
> >> building guests and mapping guest memory, xentrace mapping xen
> >> pages, etc..
>
> Thanks.
>
> Applied to devel/for-linus-3.16, but see comments below.
>
> >> +static int xlate_add_to_p2m(unsigned long lpfn, unsigned long
> >> fgmfn,
> >> + unsigned int domid)
>
> The preferred abbreviation is GFN not GMFN. I fixed this up.
>
> >> +{
> >> + int rc, err = 0;
> >> + xen_pfn_t gpfn = lpfn;
> >> + xen_ulong_t idx = fgmfn;
> >> +
> >> + struct xen_add_to_physmap_range xatp = {
> >> + .domid = DOMID_SELF,
> >> + .foreign_domid = domid,
> >> + .size = 1,
> >> + .space = XENMAPSPACE_gmfn_foreign,
> >> + };
> >> + set_xen_guest_handle(xatp.idxs, &idx);
> >> + set_xen_guest_handle(xatp.gpfns, &gpfn);
> >> + set_xen_guest_handle(xatp.errs, &err);
> >> +
> >> + rc = HYPERVISOR_memory_op(XENMEM_add_to_physmap_range,
> >> &xatp);
> >> + return rc;
> >
> > Thanks for the patches, I see two problems with this approach, the
> > first one is that you are completely ignoring the error in the
> > variable "err", which means that you can end up with a pfn that
> > Linux thinks it's valid, but it's not mapped to any mfn, so when
> > you try to access it you will trigger the vioapic crash.
>
> I spotted this and fixed this up by adding:
>
> + if (rc < 0)
> + return rc;
> + return err;
Thanks a lot.
> > The second one is that this seems extremely inefficient, you are
> > issuing one hypercall for each memory page, when you could instead
> > batch all the pages into a single hypercall and map them in one
> > shot.
>
> I agree, but the 3.16 merge window is nearly here so I've applied it
> as-is. Note that the privcmd driver calls this function once per
> page, so the lack of batching doesn't really hurt here.
Thanks again, pleasure working with maintainer like you!
Mukesh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists