linux-kernel - Re: perf_fuzzer crash on pentium 4

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 28 May 2014 18:06:32 +0400
From:	Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
To:	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Cc:	Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@...ne.edu>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: perf_fuzzer crash on pentium 4

On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 03:56:17PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> > So just to be difficult I fired up the perf_fuzzer on a Pentium 4 machine.
> > 
> > It crashes more or less instantly (sorry for the line wrapping, 
> > just got the serial console hooked up and don't have minicom configured 
> > right yet).
> > 
> > this is 3.15-rc4 with the anti-memory corruption patch applied.
> > 
> > [   67.872274] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 00000004
> > [   67.876146] IP: [<ffffffff81013df2>] p4_pmu_schedule_events+0xa5/0x331
> 
> Pentium 4 's were not 64bit, were they?

Not all, but there were 64bit varians (Xeons iirc).
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/