[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140528152011.GX11096@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 28 May 2014 17:20:11 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@...ne.edu>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: perf_fuzzer crash on pentium 4
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 06:06:32PM +0400, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 03:56:17PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > > So just to be difficult I fired up the perf_fuzzer on a Pentium 4 machine.
> > >
> > > It crashes more or less instantly (sorry for the line wrapping,
> > > just got the serial console hooked up and don't have minicom configured
> > > right yet).
> > >
> > > this is 3.15-rc4 with the anti-memory corruption patch applied.
> > >
> > > [ 67.872274] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 00000004
> > > [ 67.876146] IP: [<ffffffff81013df2>] p4_pmu_schedule_events+0xa5/0x331
> >
> > Pentium 4 's were not 64bit, were they?
>
> Not all, but there were 64bit varians (Xeons iirc).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pentium_d
consumer netburst chip with x86_64.
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists