[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140528133718.160a4754@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Wed, 28 May 2014 13:37:18 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] tracing: Print nasty banner when trace_printk() is
in use
On Wed, 28 May 2014 19:22:39 +0200
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 01:14:40PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> >
> > trace_printk() is used to debug fast paths within the kernel. Places
> > that gets called in any context (interrupt or NMI) or thousands of
> > times a second. Something you do not want to do with a printk().
> >
> > In order to make it completely lockless as it needs a temporary buffer
> > to handle some of the string formatting, a page is created per cpu for
> > every context (four per cpu; normal, softirq, irq, NMI).
> >
> > Since trace_printk() should only be used for debugging purposes,
> > there's no reason to waste memory on these buffers on a production
> > system. That means, trace_printk() should never be used unless a
> > developer is debugging their kernel. There's macro magic to allocate
> > the buffers if trace_printk() is used anywhere in the kernel.
> >
> > To help enforce that trace_printk() isn't used outside of development,
> > when it is used, a nasty banner is displayed on bootup (or when a module
> > is loaded that uses trace_printk() and the kernel core does not).
> >
> > Here's the banner:
> >
> > ****************************************
> > ** NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE **
> > ** trace_printk() being used. **
> > ** Allocating extra memory for it **
> > ****************************************
> >
> > Hmm, maybe I should add "Not for production use" to scare people even
> > more?
>
> Does that really stop people from doing stupid? Wouldn't it be better to
Scary banners usually do. Perhaps this isn't scary enough.
> make sure nobody merges a trace_printk() user in mainline? You can set
> up a commit hook and check for +.*trace_printk or so.
Of course, but that requires me to monitory it. It may be too late when
I notice it.
Nothing prevents me from doing both :-)
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists