linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] regulators: Add definition of regulator_set_voltage_time() for !CONFIG

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 28 May 2014 18:37:55 +0100
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Cc:	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
	linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, arvind.chauhan@....com,
	edubezval@...il.com, pavel@....cz, lgirdwood@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] regulators: Add definition of
 regulator_set_voltage_time() for !CONFIG_REGULATOR

On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 01:12:57AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tuesday, May 27, 2014 08:29:23 PM Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 05:37:29PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:

> > > Liam/Broonie: Please see if this can go through Rafael as 2nd patch is dependent
> > > on it.

> > Is that likely to happen before the merge window?

> Depending.  If there's -rc8, then maybe.  Otherwise, nope.

The reason I was asking was that I'm happy to just go ahead and apply
the patch right now if you're likely to not apply the second patch until
after the merge window.  Let's just do that for now, if you decide you
will apply then please add my ack and let me know so I can drop the
duplicate.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)