[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140528173858.GG5099@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 28 May 2014 18:38:58 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Lists linaro-kernel <linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org>,
"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Arvind Chauhan <arvind.chauhan@....com>,
Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@...il.com>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] regulators: Add definition of
regulator_set_voltage_time() for !CONFIG_REGULATOR
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 09:59:37PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 28 May 2014 00:59, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:
> > Hrm, I'd have expected this to return -EINVAL when stubbed. I'd also
> > have expected regulator_set_voltage() to return -EINVAL mind you. I
> Or ENOSYS ? I will fix both routines once you confirm..
Whatever - I don't think the particular code makes any practical
difference. We would need to audit existing users who don't have a
REGULATOR dependency for breakage though.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists