linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] regulators: Add definition of regulator_set_voltage_time() for !CONFIG

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 28 May 2014 18:38:58 +0100
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
	Lists linaro-kernel <linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org>,
	"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Arvind Chauhan <arvind.chauhan@....com>,
	Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@...il.com>,
	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] regulators: Add definition of
 regulator_set_voltage_time() for !CONFIG_REGULATOR

On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 09:59:37PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 28 May 2014 00:59, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:

> > Hrm, I'd have expected this to return -EINVAL when stubbed.  I'd also
> > have expected regulator_set_voltage() to return -EINVAL mind you.  I

> Or ENOSYS ? I will fix both routines once you confirm..

Whatever - I don't think the particular code makes any practical
difference.  We would need to audit existing users who don't have a
REGULATOR dependency for breakage though.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)