linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ARM: OMAP: SX1: remove check for CONFIG_SX1_OLD

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140529191738.GA18567@atomide.com>
Date:	Thu, 29 May 2014 12:17:39 -0700
From:	Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
To:	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Cc:	Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: OMAP: SX1: remove check for CONFIG_SX1_OLD_FLASH

* Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz> [140529 12:03]:
> On Fri 2014-05-16 14:12:31, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > * Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl> [140515 12:42]:
> > > A check for CONFIG_SX1_OLD_FLASH was added in v2.6.24. But the related
> > > Kconfig symbol was never part of the tree. So we can remove some dead
> > > code.
> > 
> > Thanks applying into omap-for-v3.16/board.
> 
> Actually... It seems there are two variant of SX1, and this is very
> useful piece of documentation how the _other_ variant looks.
> 
> And if someone is hacking linux on sx1, he can probably figure out
> #ifdef in .c file...
> 
> IOW adding the config option might be better solution.

Or just a comment saying the same?

Regards,

Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/