linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ARM: OMAP: SX1: remove check for CONFIG_SX1_OLD

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140529190227.GB18230@amd.pavel.ucw.cz>
Date:	Thu, 29 May 2014 21:02:27 +0200
From:	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To:	Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
Cc:	Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: OMAP: SX1: remove check for CONFIG_SX1_OLD_FLASH

On Fri 2014-05-16 14:12:31, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl> [140515 12:42]:
> > A check for CONFIG_SX1_OLD_FLASH was added in v2.6.24. But the related
> > Kconfig symbol was never part of the tree. So we can remove some dead
> > code.
> 
> Thanks applying into omap-for-v3.16/board.

Actually... It seems there are two variant of SX1, and this is very
useful piece of documentation how the _other_ variant looks.

And if someone is hacking linux on sx1, he can probably figure out
#ifdef in .c file...

IOW adding the config option might be better solution.
									Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/