[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5387B287.5050007@ti.com>
Date: Thu, 29 May 2014 17:19:51 -0500
From: Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>, <rjw@...ysocki.net>
CC: <linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org>, <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <arvind.chauhan@....com>,
<inderpal.s@...sung.com>, <chander.kashyap@...aro.org>,
<pavel@....cz>, <len.brown@...el.com>, <sudeep.holla@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 1/8] opp: of_init_opp_table(): return -ENOSYS when
feature isn't implemented
minor (Rafael usually fixes it up, but still):
$subject: PM / OPP:
On 05/27/2014 06:50 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> When none of CONFIG_PM_OPP or CONFIG_OF is enabled we use the dummy
> implementation of of_init_opp_table() routine, which returns -EINVAL currently.
> -EINVAL can confuse the callers a bit as it can have other meanings for the
> actual implementation of this routine.
>
> It is more appropriate to return -ENOSYS instead to avoid confusion at caller.
>
> Suggested-and-reviewed-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
otherwise,
Acked-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>
> ---
> include/linux/pm_opp.h | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/pm_opp.h b/include/linux/pm_opp.h
> index 0330217..6668150 100644
> --- a/include/linux/pm_opp.h
> +++ b/include/linux/pm_opp.h
> @@ -112,7 +112,7 @@ int of_init_opp_table(struct device *dev);
> #else
> static inline int of_init_opp_table(struct device *dev)
> {
> - return -EINVAL;
> + return -ENOSYS;
> }
> #endif
>
>
--
Regards,
Nishanth Menon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists