[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20140529152153.5387970fd21c7add9837cfe3@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu, 29 May 2014 15:21:53 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Fabian Frederick <fabf@...net.be>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Petr Vandrovec <petr@...drovec.name>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] fs/ncpfs/getopt.c: replace simple_strtoul by
kstrtoul
On Fri, 23 May 2014 22:26:11 +0200 Fabian Frederick <fabf@...net.be> wrote:
> Remove obsolete simple_strtoul in ncp_getopt
Looks good to me.
>
> --- a/fs/ncpfs/getopt.c
> +++ b/fs/ncpfs/getopt.c
> @@ -53,15 +53,14 @@ int ncp_getopt(const char *caller, char **options, const struct ncp_option *opts
> return -EINVAL;
> }
> if (opts->has_arg & OPT_INT) {
> - char* v;
> + int rc = kstrtoul(val, 0, value);
>
> - *value = simple_strtoul(val, &v, 0);
> - if (!*v) {
> - return opts->val;
> + if (rc) {
> + pr_info("%s: invalid numeric value in %s=%s\n",
> + caller, token, val);
> + return rc;
Because kstrtoul("42foo", ...) returns -EINVAL rather than 42. This
behaviour isn't obvious - I had to dive into the implementation to work
it out. We forgot to document what kstrtoul() considers a "parsing
error".
> }
> - pr_info("%s: invalid numeric value in %s=%s\n",
> - caller, token, val);
> - return -EDOM;
> + return opts->val;
> }
> if (opts->has_arg & OPT_STRING) {
> return opts->val;
> --
> 1.9.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists