[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140530154229.46d76630@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Fri, 30 May 2014 15:42:29 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
Cc: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...oraproject.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-next@...r.kernel.org" <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] x86,vdso: vdso build fixes and improvements
Hi Andy,
On Thu, 29 May 2014 15:49:52 -0700 Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net> wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 3:41 PM, Paul Gortmaker
> <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com> wrote:
> > On 14-05-29 05:57 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> >> Patch 1 causes make;make to behave similarly to make if vdso2c fails.
> >> Patch 2 hopefully fixes x86 crossbuilds on big-endian machines. I don't
> >> have a big-endian machine to test on, though.
> >
> > Since the x86 builds are unconditionally failing as-is now in
> > linux-next, perhaps Stephen [Cc'd] can layer these on the top of
> > the tree he'll be making within the next couple of hours to give
> > them a big-endian test.
I added them just after the merge of the tip tree today and will keep
them there until they (or somo other solution) turn up some other way.
> Stephen, if you do this, could you also send me some of the build outputs:
>
> arch/x86/vdso/*.so.dbg
> arch/x86/vdso/*-image-*.c
>
> I'd like to verify that the output is correct. It would be
> unfortunate if the cross-built kernel had some subtle error.
OK, I will send them in a separate email.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists