linux-kernel - Re: [RFC/PATCH 0/2] perf tools: Factor sort elide

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <878upjg6lx.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com>
Date:	Fri, 30 May 2014 14:47:54 +0900
From:	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...il.com>
To:	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
	Corey Ashford <cjashfor@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH 0/2] perf tools: Factor sort elide

On Fri, 23 May 2014 17:15:45 +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> hi,
> factoring the elide code to make perf_hpp__should_skip
> function cheap call/check again.

Both look good to me!

Acked-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>


>
> Also I was wondering.. do we want to get rid of sort_entry
> structs in favor of perf_hpp__* stuff? Any plans?

Probably.. but there's no plan for me currently. :)

Thanks,
Namhyung
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/