lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAAVeFuLMLfa-1RhcdSrKDUz7=eLqZurBSFSsN7N0x-0S+_btJA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Sat, 31 May 2014 00:59:53 +0900
From:	Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>
To:	abdoulaye berthe <berthe.ab@...il.com>
Cc:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>, m@...s.ch,
	"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] gpio: removes all usage of gpiochip_remove retval

On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 8:37 PM, abdoulaye berthe <berthe.ab@...il.com> wrote:
> The aim of this patch is to make gpiochip_remove() behavior consistent,
> especially when issuing a remove request while the chipio chip is still
> requested. It is the 1st patch in a serie af 2 patches. the 2nd patch
> changes the return value of gpiochip_remove() from int to void. This one
> updates users of the return value.

This comment belongs to a cover letter (PATCH 0/2), not to the first
patch of your series. Add --cover-letter to git format-patch to
produce one.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ