[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+5PVA74Tbxr_zDYUAeeZt8LHJu+MGncximjf_Yjf8WiYTO5LQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 31 May 2014 10:58:02 -0400
From: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...oraproject.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...e.cz>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [git pull] Re: fs/dcache.c - BUG: soft lockup - CPU#5 stuck for
22s! [systemd-udevd:1667]
On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 10:48 AM, Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, 31 May 2014, Josh Boyer wrote:
>>
>> One of my machines got the lockdep report below when booting a kernel
>> that contained these patches.
>
> I think this is just a lacking annotation.
>
> We do nest dentry d_lock locking, and in order to avoid ABBA deadlocks the
> rule is that we lock things in topological order (parent dentry first).
> lock_parent() is very careful about that, but doesn't actually tell
> lockdep about it.
>
> This trivial oneliner should fix it.
Thanks, I'll give it a spin later today.
josh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists