[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+5PVA4cSTpzoqqXdxT+GqEGDqZ1X6nPXoWo8OKJc_ePBDBzbQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 31 May 2014 12:12:18 -0400
From: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...oraproject.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...e.cz>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [git pull] Re: fs/dcache.c - BUG: soft lockup - CPU#5 stuck for
22s! [systemd-udevd:1667]
On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 10:48 AM, Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, 31 May 2014, Josh Boyer wrote:
>>
>> One of my machines got the lockdep report below when booting a kernel
>> that contained these patches.
>
> I think this is just a lacking annotation.
>
> We do nest dentry d_lock locking, and in order to avoid ABBA deadlocks the
> rule is that we lock things in topological order (parent dentry first).
> lock_parent() is very careful about that, but doesn't actually tell
> lockdep about it.
>
> This trivial oneliner should fix it.
>
> Linus
Built the previous kernel with just this applied and it seems to
behave correctly on several reboots. I think this looks good.
Thanks!
josh
>
> ---
> fs/dcache.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/dcache.c b/fs/dcache.c
> index bce851dc03ef..be2bea834bf4 100644
> --- a/fs/dcache.c
> +++ b/fs/dcache.c
> @@ -553,7 +553,7 @@ again:
> }
> rcu_read_unlock();
> if (parent != dentry)
> - spin_lock(&dentry->d_lock);
> + spin_lock_nested(&dentry->d_lock, DENTRY_D_LOCK_NESTED);
> else
> parent = NULL;
> return parent;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists