[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140601225730.GA16495@kroah.com>
Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2014 15:57:30 -0700
From: "greg@...ah.com" <greg@...ah.com>
To: Matthew Garrett <matthew.garrett@...ula.com>
Cc: "andreas.noever@...il.com" <andreas.noever@...il.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
"bhelgaas@...gle.com" <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/15] Thunderbolt driver for Apple MacBooks
On Sun, Jun 01, 2014 at 10:02:04PM +0000, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Sun, 2014-06-01 at 22:45 +0200, Andreas Noever wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 1, 2014 at 6:07 PM, Matthew Garrett
> > <matthew.garrett@...ula.com> wrote:
> > > Yeah, it seems I don't need the suspend quirk - the NHI is still there
> > > without it. I still think we should make the quirk general rather than
> > > tying it to the machines, the worst case is that it'll just do nothing.
> > Ok, agreed. The "wait" quirk has to run on all machines and the other
> > one will fail if the ACPI methods are not there. Should I resend the
> > series or just the patch or should I (or do you want to) make a
> > separate patch?
>
> Probably best to ask Greg - I'm fine with this stuff going through his
> tree (note to Greg: the Apple ACPI patches I just sent need to be merged
> before this stuff will work properly)
Ok, I'll still queue these up, I don't want the to be lost at all, and
will wait for the ACPI patches to land before starting to complain that
things don't work on my box :)
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists