linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 00/15] Thunderbolt driver for Apple MacBooks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 1 Jun 2014 22:02:04 +0000
From:	Matthew Garrett <matthew.garrett@...ula.com>
To:	"andreas.noever@...il.com" <andreas.noever@...il.com>
CC:	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
	"greg@...ah.com" <greg@...ah.com>,
	"bhelgaas@...gle.com" <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/15] Thunderbolt driver for Apple MacBooks

On Sun, 2014-06-01 at 22:45 +0200, Andreas Noever wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 1, 2014 at 6:07 PM, Matthew Garrett
> <matthew.garrett@...ula.com> wrote:
> > Yeah, it seems I don't need the suspend quirk - the NHI is still there
> > without it. I still think we should make the quirk general rather than
> > tying it to the machines, the worst case is that it'll just do nothing.
> Ok, agreed. The "wait" quirk has to run on all machines and the other
> one will fail if the ACPI methods are not there. Should I resend the
> series or just the patch or should I (or do you want to) make a
> separate patch?

Probably best to ask Greg - I'm fine with this stuff going through his
tree (note to Greg: the Apple ACPI patches I just sent need to be merged
before this stuff will work properly)

-- 
Matthew Garrett <matthew.garrett@...ula.com>