linux-kernel - Re: [RFC 17/32] ubifs: convert to struct inode

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1401695682.11182.108.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com>
Date:	Mon, 02 Jun 2014 10:54:42 +0300
From:	Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@...il.com>
To:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
	joseph@...esourcery.com, john.stultz@...aro.org, hch@...radead.org,
	tglx@...utronix.de, geert@...ux-m68k.org, lftan@...era.com,
	hpa@...or.com, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
	linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 17/32] ubifs: convert to struct inode_time

On Fri, 2014-05-30 at 22:01 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> ubifs uses 64-bit integers for inode timestamps, which will work
> practicall forever, but the VFS uses struct timespec for timestamps,
> which is only good until 2038 on 32-bit CPUs.
> 
> This gets us one small step closer to lifting the VFS limit by using
> struct inode_time in ubifs.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> Cc: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@...il.com>
> Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
> Cc: linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org

Looks fine from UBIFS POW, thanks!

-- 
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/