[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <538CA269.6010300@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2014 09:12:25 -0700
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@...il.com>,
Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Andres Freund <andres@...quadrant.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] replace PAGECACHE_TAG_* definition with enumeration
On 06/01/2014 10:24 PM, Naoya Horiguchi wrote:
> -#define PAGECACHE_TAG_DIRTY 0
> -#define PAGECACHE_TAG_WRITEBACK 1
> -#define PAGECACHE_TAG_TOWRITE 2
> +enum {
> + PAGECACHE_TAG_DIRTY,
> + PAGECACHE_TAG_WRITEBACK,
> + PAGECACHE_TAG_TOWRITE,
> + __NR_PAGECACHE_TAGS,
> +};
Doesn't this end up exposing kernel-internal values out to a userspace
interface? Wouldn't that lock these values in to the ABI?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists