[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140602161234.GG2654@katana>
Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2014 18:12:34 +0200
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
To: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Yao Jin <yao.jin@...el.com>, Aubrey Li <aubrey.li@...el.com>,
linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] i2c: designware: No need to disable already disabled
controller
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 05:37:21PM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> If the controller is already in desired state (enabled/disabled) there is
> no point in setting its state again.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
Does it have a side-effect when setting then enable bit again? Otherwise
it will exit the loop immediately on the first try. Not too bad IMO
given the additional code saved.
> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-core.c | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-core.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-core.c
> index b58ecf19e767..b0792675b970 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-core.c
> @@ -258,6 +258,10 @@ static void __i2c_dw_enable(struct dw_i2c_dev *dev, bool enable)
> {
> int timeout = 100;
>
> + /* In case the controller is already in desired state */
> + if ((dw_readl(dev, DW_IC_ENABLE_STATUS) & 1) == enable)
> + return;
> +
> do {
> dw_writel(dev, enable, DW_IC_ENABLE);
> if ((dw_readl(dev, DW_IC_ENABLE_STATUS) & 1) == enable)
> --
> 2.0.0.rc2
>
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists