[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJfpegtobxoMs+RRrPYLFRPOVSfr_uqZs+HJFLRif3svHGyQwA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2014 11:42:32 +0200
From: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
To: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...il.com>
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
"J. R. Okajima" <hooanon05g@...il.com>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Robo Bot <apw@...onical.com>, Felix Fietkau <nbd@...nwrt.org>,
Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>,
Jordi Pujol <jordipujolp@...il.com>, ezk@....cs.sunysb.edu,
"mszeredi@...e.cz" <mszeredi@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: Unionmount and overlayfs testsuite
On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 11:26 AM, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...il.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 11:18 AM, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...il.com> wrote:
>> [...]
>>>> [ NOTE-2: The call-trace I have seen once (TERMSLASH=0). ]
>>>
>>> Do you know for which operation?
This still looks like the same annotation problem in
generic_file_splice_write() I already sent a patch for.
Fix now pushed to overlayfs.v22/overlayfs.current.
Also added ops to shmem to support the cases where RENAME_EXCHANGE and
RENAME_WHITEOUT are needed. Not sure if the testsuite goes into these
at all, but anyway.
If I remove the assert_early_copy_up calls from impermissible.test
(which seem to be bogus), then the suite passes for overlayfs without
lockdep problems for me.
Thanks,
Miklos
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists